WHAT IS IDÉLABORATORIET?
Idélaboratoriet is a consulting company specializing in creativity and innovation. Idélaboratoriet was founded in 2000.
WHAT DOES IDÉLABORATORIET DO?
Idélaboratoriet works in the field of creativity and innovation. We create value for our clients for example through innovation strategy planning, facilitation of creative processes, training programs in professional idea creation and implementation of digital idea management solutions.
WHAT DOES "IDÉLABORATORIET" MEAN?
Idélaboratoriet is Swedish for The Idea Lab.
WHERE IS IDÉLABORATORIET LOCATED?
Idélaboratoriet was founded in Sweden and has its headquarters in Malmö in southern Sweden, but works with clients worldwide.
WHAT DOES CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION REALLY MEAN?
Idélaboratoriet likes to say that creativity is a process of getting original ideas that have some sort of value and innovation is the profitable implementation of creativity.
HOW DO YOU CONTACT IDÉLABORATORIET?
Call +46 734 340031. Please do not hesitate to contact us for a discussion on how we can help your organization!
The European Union adapted an innovation vision in the year 2000 that aimed to create :“the most dynamic and competitive knowledge-based economy in the world capable of sustainable economic growth [..] by 2010″. At halftime we are not even close to that vision. At halftime the Kok report on the progress of the Lisbon Agenda claims that the result so far is a “disappointing delivery“. At halftime the man in charge, Romano Prodi, leaves the stage calling the project “a big failure“.So what now? Here is some of the findings in the Kok report and the solutions it suggests.
The Kok Report presented to the European Council on 4 November 2004 will serve as a basis for the mid-term review of the Lisbon agenda, which will be adopted by the Spring Council in March 2005. The long-awaited report takes a gloomy view on the progress made in the last four years, stating that the “disappointing delivery” is due to “an overloaded agenda, poor co-ordination and conflicting priorities”. It blames mainly the lack of political will by the member states. It paints a mixed picture as some progress was made: the employment rate rose from 62.5 per cent in 1999 to 64.3 per cent in 2003 and overall female employment rose considerably too. But it says that ‘net job creation’ stopped in 2001 and that the target of 70 per cent employment rate by 2010 will be difficult to reach. It also lacks clear innovation targets and the exiciting targets show bad results.
The Kok report then goes on to make policy recommendations in five areas:
To attract and keep the best researchers: an action plan to reduce the administrative obstacles for moving to and within the EU for world class scientists and researchers and their dependants
To make R&D a top priority: establishment by the end of 2005 of a European Research Council
To promote innovation: agree before the 2005 Spring Summit on the Community Patent
Faster transposition of internal market legislation: Commission to produce full list of legislation awaiting transposition
Remove obstacles to free movement of services by the end 2005
Adopt remaining legislation of Financial Services Action Plan
Improve climate for entrepreneurs
Better lawmaking by continuing to carry out impact assessments of future legislation
Member states to reduce time, effort and costs for setting up a business by the end of 2005
Build an adaptable and inclusive labour market
Implement the recommendations of the European Employment Taskforce in 2003
National strategies for life-long learning by 2005
Member states to develop a comprehensive active ageing strategy by 2006
An environmentally sustainable future
Environment and competitiveness as win-win: promote development of eco-innovations and national road maps for the implementation of the EU’s Environmental Technology Action Plan
National action plans for ‘greening’ public procurement
The incoming president Barroso first and foremost, he agreed with the Kok report that better ownership is needed, thereby backing the ‘naming and shaming’ approach taken by the group. Further ideas of the future Commission president include a “Mr Lisbon” in each national capital, national action plans (as outlined in the Kok report) and a single Council formation to co-ordinate the implementation. In their conclusions, heads of state and government responded rather vaguely to the findings and suggestions of the Kok report, but they did give Barroso the mandate “to make the implementation of the Lisbon Strategy a key component of the Commission’s policy.”
So time to show some action when it comes to innovation and entreprenuership – it time to get out of the bureaucratic trenches and really put innovation and its role models on center stage. Not in a booklet, not in the form of a report, but on the city street, in the schools and in every mans labour. If you want to have welfare – innovation is the answer!
This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 15th, 2004 at 13:45. It is filed under Newsletters and tagged with EU, Lisbon agenda.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.